<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VPS Benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vpsbenchmarks.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vpsbenchmarks.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 03:05:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PrismaVPS Benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/10/prismavps-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/10/prismavps-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 03:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VPS Benchmarks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[100Mbps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD Opteron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenVZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas City VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas City VPS Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oak Tower VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PrismaVPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PrismaVPS Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PrismaVPS Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vpsbenchmarks.net/?p=534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction: PrismaVPS is a VPS hosting company with servers in Kansas City, Missouri at the Oak Tower hosting facility. The servers are extremely affordable with the current plan I am reviewing coming in at $4 per month for 256mb of RAM, 30gb of disk space and 3TB of network transfer. I&#8217;ve seen services offer 1TB ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Introduction:</strong><br />
<a href="http://prismavps.com/" target="_blank">PrismaVPS</a> is a VPS hosting company with servers in Kansas City, Missouri at the Oak Tower hosting facility. The servers are extremely affordable with the current plan I am reviewing coming in at $4 per month for 256mb of RAM, 30gb of disk space and 3TB of network transfer. I&#8217;ve seen services offer 1TB of bandwidth and similar specs for almost double that price.</p>
<ul>
<li>256mb RAM</li>
<li>512mb burstable RAM</li>
<li>30gb of disk space</li>
<li>3000gb of network transfer</li>
<li>Kansas City, Missouri (Oak Tower) data center</li>
<li><a href="http://prismavps.com/" target="_blank"> $4 per month</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Hardware:</strong></p>
<pre># cat /proc/cpuinfo 
processor	: 0
vendor_id	: AuthenticAMD
cpu family	: 21
model		: 1
model name	: AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 6274                 
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 1466.783
cache size	: 2048 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 16
core id		: 0
cpu cores	: 8
apicid		: 32
initial apicid	: 0
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 13
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc extd_apicid amd_dcm aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq monitor ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes xsave avx lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs xop skinit wdt lwp fma4 nodeid_msr topoext perfctr_core cpb npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save tsc_scale vmcb_clean flushbyasid decodeassists pausefilter pfthreshold
bogomips	: 4400.35
TLB size	: 1536 4K pages
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts ttp tm 100mhzsteps hwpstate cpb

processor	: 1
vendor_id	: AuthenticAMD
cpu family	: 21
model		: 1
model name	: AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 6274                 
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 1466.783
cache size	: 2048 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 16
core id		: 1
cpu cores	: 8
apicid		: 33
initial apicid	: 1
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 13
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc extd_apicid amd_dcm aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq monitor ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes xsave avx lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs xop skinit wdt lwp fma4 nodeid_msr topoext perfctr_core cpb npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save tsc_scale vmcb_clean flushbyasid decodeassists pausefilter pfthreshold
bogomips	: 4400.35
TLB size	: 1536 4K pages
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts ttp tm 100mhzsteps hwpstate cpb

processor	: 2
vendor_id	: AuthenticAMD
cpu family	: 21
model		: 1
model name	: AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 6274                 
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 1466.783
cache size	: 2048 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 16
core id		: 2
cpu cores	: 8
apicid		: 34
initial apicid	: 2
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 13
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc extd_apicid amd_dcm aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq monitor ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes xsave avx lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs xop skinit wdt lwp fma4 nodeid_msr topoext perfctr_core cpb npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save tsc_scale vmcb_clean flushbyasid decodeassists pausefilter pfthreshold
bogomips	: 4400.35
TLB size	: 1536 4K pages
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts ttp tm 100mhzsteps hwpstate cpb

processor	: 3
vendor_id	: AuthenticAMD
cpu family	: 21
model		: 1
model name	: AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 6274                 
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 1466.783
cache size	: 2048 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 16
core id		: 3
cpu cores	: 8
apicid		: 35
initial apicid	: 3
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 13
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc extd_apicid amd_dcm aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq monitor ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes xsave avx lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs xop skinit wdt lwp fma4 nodeid_msr topoext perfctr_core cpb npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save tsc_scale vmcb_clean flushbyasid decodeassists pausefilter pfthreshold
bogomips	: 4400.35
TLB size	: 1536 4K pages
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts ttp tm 100mhzsteps hwpstate cpb

processor	: 4
vendor_id	: AuthenticAMD
cpu family	: 21
model		: 1
model name	: AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 6274                 
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 1466.783
cache size	: 2048 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 16
core id		: 4
cpu cores	: 8
apicid		: 36
initial apicid	: 4
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 13
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc extd_apicid amd_dcm aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq monitor ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes xsave avx lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs xop skinit wdt lwp fma4 nodeid_msr topoext perfctr_core cpb npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save tsc_scale vmcb_clean flushbyasid decodeassists pausefilter pfthreshold
bogomips	: 4400.35
TLB size	: 1536 4K pages
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts ttp tm 100mhzsteps hwpstate cpb

processor	: 5
vendor_id	: AuthenticAMD
cpu family	: 21
model		: 1
model name	: AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 6274                 
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 1466.783
cache size	: 2048 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 16
core id		: 5
cpu cores	: 8
apicid		: 37
initial apicid	: 5
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 13
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc extd_apicid amd_dcm aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq monitor ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes xsave avx lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs xop skinit wdt lwp fma4 nodeid_msr topoext perfctr_core cpb npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save tsc_scale vmcb_clean flushbyasid decodeassists pausefilter pfthreshold
bogomips	: 4400.35
TLB size	: 1536 4K pages
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts ttp tm 100mhzsteps hwpstate cpb</pre>
<p><strong>Hardware Benchmarks:</strong></p>
<pre>   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: vps.server.com: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab061.2 -- #1 SMP Fri Aug 24 09:07:21 MSK 2012
   Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 6274  (4400.4 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 1: AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 6274  (4400.4 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 2: AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 6274  (4400.4 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 3: AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 6274  (4400.4 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 4: AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 6274  (4400.4 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 5: AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 6274  (4400.4 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   02:06:11 up 7 days, 21:18,  1 user,  load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 04 2012 02:06:11 - 02:34:01
6 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       19572138.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2558.7 MWIPS (9.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2083.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        424388.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          129973.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        897888.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1041170.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  69285.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               4835.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3321.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1296.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1042561.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   19572138.1   1677.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2558.7    465.2
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2083.7    484.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     424388.0   1071.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     129973.9    785.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     897888.4   1548.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1041170.3    837.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      69285.9    173.2
Process Creation                                126.0       4835.7    383.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3321.8    783.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1296.4   2160.7
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1042561.1    695.0
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         751.1

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 04 2012 02:34:01 - 03:02:54
6 CPUs in system; running 6 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       76717003.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    13605.8 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               7369.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        293380.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           79016.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        823837.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             3793998.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 153420.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              15988.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   9607.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1125.5 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1488341.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   76717003.3   6573.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      13605.8   2473.8
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       7369.1   1713.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     293380.7    740.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      79016.9    477.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     823837.5   1420.4
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    3793998.5   3049.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     153420.5    383.6
Process Creation                                126.0      15988.7   1268.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       9607.3   2265.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1125.5   1875.8
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1488341.6    992.2
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1451.8</pre>
<p><strong>ioping default benchmarks:</strong></p>
<pre>**********************************
dd (sequential disk speed test)...
**********************************
dd if=/dev/zero of=testfilex bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 14.0679 s, 76.3 MB/s

************************
starting ioping tests...
***************************************************
ioping disk I/O test (default 1MB working set)
***************************************************
disk I/O: /
--- / (simfs /vz/private/116) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4018.5 ms, 281 iops, 1.1 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/3.6/10.5/4.3 ms

**********************************************
seek rate test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
seek rate: /
--- / (simfs /vz/private/116) ioping statistics ---
11818 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 5198 iops, 20.3 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.2/26.2/1.0 ms

**********************************************
sequential test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
-----------------------
sequential: /
--- / (simfs /vz/private/116) ioping statistics ---
5901 requests completed in 3000.2 ms, 2386 iops, 596.6 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/0.4/20.0/0.9 ms
-----------------------
sequential cached I/O: /
--- / (simfs /vz/private/116) ioping statistics ---
22968 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 13444 iops, 3361.1 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/9.5/0.1 ms</pre>
<p><strong>ioping custom benchmarks:</strong></p>
<pre>################################
ioping disk I/O test
(custom 4 32 64 256 (KB) request size)
################################

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 4K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /vz/private/116) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4031.7 ms, 161 iops, 0.6 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.3/6.2/9.4/3.1 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 32K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /vz/private/116) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4011.1 ms, 491 iops, 15.4 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.3/2.0/8.8/3.4 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 64K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /vz/private/116) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4021.7 ms, 237 iops, 14.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.5/4.2/13.0/5.0 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 256K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /vz/private/116) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4014.8 ms, 366 iops, 91.5 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.6/2.7/10.2/3.7 ms

################################
ioping seek rate test
(custom 4 32 64 256 (KB) request size)
################################

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 4K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /vz/private/116) ioping statistics ---
9071 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 3721 iops, 14.5 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.3/32.9/1.3 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 32K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /vz/private/116) ioping statistics ---
7505 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 2980 iops, 93.1 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.3/41.0/1.6 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 64K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /vz/private/116) ioping statistics ---
7831 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 3196 iops, 199.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.3/24.3/1.2 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 256K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /vz/private/116) ioping statistics ---
4870 requests completed in 3000.0 ms, 1903 iops, 475.7 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/0.5/18.6/1.4 ms</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/10/prismavps-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VPS6.NET Turkey VPS Benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/10/vps6-net-turkey-vps-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/10/vps6-net-turkey-vps-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VPS Benchmarks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[100Mbps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD Opteron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenVZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPS6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Istanbul Turkey VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Istanbul VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radore Data Center VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radore VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkish VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPS6.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPS6.NET Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPS6.NET Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vpsbenchmarks.net/?p=535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction: Jeremy from VPS6.NET hooked me up with a test VPS on their Turkish VPS node which is located in Istanbul, Turkey at Radore Data Center. From what I read, it seems Turkey is a well connected country with a decent network infrastructure contratry to what you may think about their standard of living. From ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Introduction:</strong><br />
Jeremy from <a title="VPS6.NET - Turkey VPS Hosting" href="http://vps6.net" target="_blank">VPS6.NET</a> hooked me up with a test VPS on their Turkish VPS node which is located in Istanbul, Turkey at Radore Data Center. From what I read, it seems Turkey is a well connected country with a decent network infrastructure contratry to what you may think about their standard of living. From what I hear, their mobile network is real good too.</p>
<p><strong>Plan:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>256mb RAM</li>
<li>512mb burstable RAM</li>
<li>20gb disk space</li>
<li>1000gb of network transfer</li>
<li>Istanbul, Turkey (Radore Data Center) location</li>
<li>$6.95 per month</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>VPS6.NET Hardware</strong></p>
<pre># cat /proc/cpuinfo 
processor	: 0
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 44
model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X5650  @ 2.67GHz
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 2666.654
cache size	: 12288 KB
physical id	: 1
siblings	: 12
core id		: 0
cpu cores	: 6
apicid		: 32
initial apicid	: 32
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 11
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes lahf_lm ida arat dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips	: 5333.30
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor	: 1
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 44
model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X5650  @ 2.67GHz
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 2666.654
cache size	: 12288 KB
physical id	: 1
siblings	: 12
core id		: 1
cpu cores	: 6
apicid		: 34
initial apicid	: 34
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 11
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes lahf_lm ida arat dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips	: 5333.79
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor	: 2
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 44
model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X5650  @ 2.67GHz
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 2666.654
cache size	: 12288 KB
physical id	: 1
siblings	: 12
core id		: 2
cpu cores	: 6
apicid		: 36
initial apicid	: 36
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 11
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes lahf_lm ida arat dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips	: 5333.79
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor	: 3
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 44
model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X5650  @ 2.67GHz
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 2666.654
cache size	: 12288 KB
physical id	: 1
siblings	: 12
core id		: 8
cpu cores	: 6
apicid		: 48
initial apicid	: 48
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 11
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes lahf_lm ida arat dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips	: 5333.79
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:</pre>
<p><strong>VPS6.NET Unixbench Benchmarks:</strong></p>
<pre>   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: tr-01: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab053.5 -- #1 SMP Tue Mar 27 11:42:17 MSD 2012
   Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5333.3 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5333.8 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5333.8 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5333.8 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   01:54:29 up 2 days, 18:51,  1 user,  load average: 0.08, 0.04, 0.01; runlevel 2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 04 2012 01:54:30 - 02:32:37
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       25308015.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3429.9 MWIPS (5.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2320.0 lps   (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        286787.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           71720.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        669056.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1600937.0 lps   (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  89991.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               5495.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   1967.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    938.4 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1803048.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   25308015.3   2168.6
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3429.9    623.6
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2320.0    539.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     286787.3    724.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      71720.9    433.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     669056.2   1153.5
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1600937.0   1286.9
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      89991.0    225.0
Process Creation                                126.0       5495.1    436.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       1967.8    464.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        938.4   1564.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1803048.2   1202.0
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         744.7

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 04 2012 02:32:37 - 03:13:16
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       74185198.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    11118.3 MWIPS (7.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               7421.8 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        358890.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           79878.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        935073.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             2651422.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 303659.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              18489.3 lps   (30.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   5843.0 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    988.6 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        4254756.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   74185198.5   6356.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      11118.3   2021.5
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       7421.8   1726.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     358890.5    906.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      79878.3    482.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     935073.9   1612.2
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2651422.3   2131.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     303659.7    759.1
Process Creation                                126.0      18489.3   1467.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       5843.0   1378.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        988.6   1647.7
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    4254756.8   2836.5
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1578.4</pre>
<p><strong>ioping Default Benchmarks:</strong></p>
<pre>
**********************************
dd (sequential disk speed test)...
**********************************
dd if=/dev/zero of=testfilex bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 19.4074 s, 55.3 MB/s


************************
starting ioping tests...
***************************************************
ioping disk I/O test (default 1MB working set)
***************************************************
disk I/O: /
--- / (simfs /vz/private/5042) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4006.7 ms, 796 iops, 3.1 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/1.3/3.1/1.3 ms

**********************************************
seek rate test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
seek rate: /
--- / (simfs /vz/private/5042) ioping statistics ---
20229 requests completed in 3000.6 ms, 13358 iops, 52.2 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.1/39.9/0.4 ms

**********************************************
sequential test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
-----------------------
sequential: /
--- / (simfs /vz/private/5042) ioping statistics ---
6491 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 2874 iops, 718.5 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.3/0.3/59.8/0.8 ms
-----------------------
sequential cached I/O: /
--- / (simfs /vz/private/5042) ioping statistics ---
24472 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 15350 iops, 3837.5 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.1/3.7/0.0 ms

</pre>
<p><strong>ioping Custom Benchmarks:</strong></p>
<pre>
################################
ioping disk I/O test
(custom 4 32 64 256 (KB) request size)
################################

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 4K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /vz/private/5042) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4001.3 ms, 7474 iops, 29.2 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.2/0.1 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 32K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /vz/private/5042) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4009.2 ms, 572 iops, 17.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/1.7/8.1/3.2 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 64K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /vz/private/5042) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4002.6 ms, 2519 iops, 157.4 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/0.4/1.0/0.3 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 256K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /vz/private/5042) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4062.1 ms, 81 iops, 20.4 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.3/12.3/29.5/9.5 ms

################################
ioping seek rate test
(custom 4 32 64 256 (KB) request size)
################################

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 4K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /vz/private/5042) ioping statistics ---
18592 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 11717 iops, 45.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.1/71.0/0.7 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 32K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /vz/private/5042) ioping statistics ---
14899 requests completed in 3000.0 ms, 8312 iops, 259.7 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.1/72.8/0.7 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 64K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /vz/private/5042) ioping statistics ---
11487 requests completed in 3000.2 ms, 5585 iops, 349.1 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/102.3/1.3 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 256K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /vz/private/5042) ioping statistics ---
2400 requests completed in 3057.9 ms, 866 iops, 216.6 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.3/1.2/151.3/5.4 ms
</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/10/vps6-net-turkey-vps-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WooServers Benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/wooservers-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/wooservers-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VPS Benchmarks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gigabit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenVZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xeon 4 Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WooServers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WooServers Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WooServers Elite VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WooServers Elite VPS Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WooServers Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vpsbenchmarks.net/?p=525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction: WooServers is a budget provider who has servers in Los Angeles and Charlotte, North Carolina. They have a budget and &#8220;premium&#8221; line. The premium has Gigabit network connection and WooServers Elite VPS #2 2.5Ghz CPU 1024mb RAM 2048mb burstable RAM 50gb disk space 2TB of network transfer on a Gigabit network connection Charlotte, North ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Introduction:</strong><br />
<a title="WooServers " href="http://www.wooservers.com" target="_blank">WooServers</a> is a budget provider who has servers in Los Angeles and Charlotte, North Carolina. They have a budget and &#8220;premium&#8221; line. The premium has Gigabit network connection and</p>
<p><strong>WooServers Elite VPS #2</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>2.5Ghz CPU</li>
<li>1024mb RAM</li>
<li>2048mb burstable RAM</li>
<li>50gb disk space</li>
<li>2TB of network transfer on a Gigabit network connection</li>
<li>Charlotte, North Carolina data center</li>
<li>$24.99 per month</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>WooServer Hardware:</strong></p>
<pre># cat /proc/cpuinfo 
processor	: 0
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 23
model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           E5450  @ 3.00GHz
stepping	: 6
cpu MHz		: 2992.529
cache size	: 6144 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 4
core id		: 0
cpu cores	: 4
apicid		: 0
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 10
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 lahf_lm
bogomips	: 5985.05
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 38 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor	: 1
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 23
model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           E5450  @ 3.00GHz
stepping	: 6
cpu MHz		: 2992.529
cache size	: 6144 KB
physical id	: 1
siblings	: 4
core id		: 0
cpu cores	: 4
apicid		: 4
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 10
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 lahf_lm
bogomips	: 5985.05
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 38 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor	: 2
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 23
model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           E5450  @ 3.00GHz
stepping	: 6
cpu MHz		: 2992.529
cache size	: 6144 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 4
core id		: 2
cpu cores	: 4
apicid		: 2
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 10
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 lahf_lm
bogomips	: 5985.01
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 38 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor	: 3
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 23
model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           E5450  @ 3.00GHz
stepping	: 6
cpu MHz		: 2992.529
cache size	: 6144 KB
physical id	: 1
siblings	: 4
core id		: 2
cpu cores	: 4
apicid		: 6
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 10
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 lahf_lm
bogomips	: 5985.05
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 38 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:</pre>
<p><strong>WooServers Benchmarks:</strong></p>
<pre>   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: forum: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-308.el5.028stab099.3 -- #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 15:56:00 MSK 2012
   Machine: i686 (unknown)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5450 @ 3.00GHz (5985.1 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5450 @ 3.00GHz (5985.1 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5450 @ 3.00GHz (5985.0 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5450 @ 3.00GHz (5985.1 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   12:20:22 up 19:50,  1 user,  load average: 0.06, 0.02, 0.00; runlevel 2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Sep 28 2012 12:20:22 - 12:48:30
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       15225655.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2824.7 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               3230.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        474174.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          143408.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        710783.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              724726.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 257858.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              10491.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   5231.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1367.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         686773.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   15225655.5   1304.7
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2824.7    513.6
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3230.0    751.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     474174.7   1197.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     143408.6    866.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     710783.4   1225.5
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     724726.9    582.6
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     257858.6    644.6
Process Creation                                126.0      10491.2    832.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       5231.4   1233.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1367.7   2279.5
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     686773.2    457.8
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         893.2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Sep 28 2012 12:48:30 - 13:17:19
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       54119780.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     9791.6 MWIPS (10.6 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               5756.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        206032.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           70248.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        410621.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             2966725.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 963097.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              26182.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  10268.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1853.2 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1863113.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   54119780.8   4637.5
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       9791.6   1780.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5756.2   1338.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     206032.6    520.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      70248.2    424.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     410621.7    708.0
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2966725.8   2384.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     963097.1   2407.7
Process Creation                                126.0      26182.6   2078.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      10268.4   2421.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1853.2   3088.7
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1863113.3   1242.1
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1549.5</pre>
<p><strong>ioping default I/O:</strong></p>
<pre>**********************************
dd (sequential disk speed test)...
**********************************
dd if=/dev/zero of=testfilex bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 42.2551 s, 25.4 MB/s

************************
starting ioping tests...
***************************************************
ioping disk I/O test (default 1MB working set)
***************************************************
disk I/O: /
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4017.0 ms, 352 iops, 1.4 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/2.8/13.8/5.5 ms

**********************************************
seek rate test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
seek rate: /
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
680 requests completed in 3011.5 ms, 284 iops, 1.1 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/3.5/882.4/35.0 ms

**********************************************
sequential test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
-----------------------
sequential: /
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
249 requests completed in 3028.6 ms, 86 iops, 21.5 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 3.4/11.6/263.2/24.7 ms
-----------------------
sequential cached I/O: /
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
2971 requests completed in 3001.3 ms, 8051 iops, 2012.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.3/0.0 ms</pre>
<p><strong>ioping custom I/O:</strong></p>
<pre>################################
ioping disk I/O test
(custom 4 32 64 256 (KB) request size)
################################

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 4K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4004.1 ms, 8117 iops, 31.7 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.2/0.0 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 32K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4033.5 ms, 156 iops, 4.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.6/6.4/24.6/9.3 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 64K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4040.3 ms, 135 iops, 8.5 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 1.0/7.4/32.4/12.5 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 256K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4081.4 ms, 64 iops, 15.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 3.7/15.7/51.4/18.3 ms

################################
ioping seek rate test
(custom 4 32 64 256 (KB) request size)
################################

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 4K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
2058 requests completed in 3000.6 ms, 1845 iops, 7.2 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.5/42.3/3.8 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 32K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
2357 requests completed in 3000.8 ms, 1306 iops, 40.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.4/0.8/445.1/9.2 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 64K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
1139 requests completed in 3000.2 ms, 517 iops, 32.3 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.8/1.9/136.8/7.1 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 256K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
559 requests completed in 3001.1 ms, 213 iops, 53.2 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 3.3/4.7/199.8/8.3 ms</pre>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong><br />
WooServers is a pretty good entry level, budget VPS hosting company but these disk benchmarks on their &#8220;elite&#8221; VPS line which is supposed to be better and have a 15k SAS (serial attached SCSI) drive is pretty weak.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if the node is overloaded or there are disk I/O abusers, such as a heavy MySQL user, but it is indeed &#8220;peak time&#8221; in the United States because it&#8217;s almost 2 o&#8217;clock in the afternoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/wooservers-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BuyVM Benchmarks &#8211; Buffalo, New York</title>
		<link>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/buyvm-benchmarks-buffalo-new-york/</link>
		<comments>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/buyvm-benchmarks-buffalo-new-york/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VPS Benchmarks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bandwidth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuyVM Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gigabit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xeon 1 Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuyVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuyVM Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuyVM performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuyVM server locations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York VPS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vpsbenchmarks.net/?p=522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction: BuyVM recently expanded from San Jose, California and opened up servers in Buffalo, NY to provide more stock to the masses. I ordered a 128mb $15 per year VPS when the stock came out for my cPanel DNS cluster and everything is fine so far. It&#8217;s the same BuyVM service that you know and ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Introduction:</strong><br />
<a title="BuyVM" href="http://buyvm.net" target="_blank">BuyVM</a> recently expanded from San Jose, California and opened up servers in Buffalo, NY to provide more stock to the masses. I ordered a 128mb $15 per year VPS when the stock came out for my cPanel DNS cluster and everything is fine so far. It&#8217;s the same BuyVM service that you know and love back in San Jose but now in Buffalo and there&#8217;s so much stock available that well.. I don&#8217;t see &#8220;out of stock&#8221; issues!</p>
<p><strong>BuyVM 128mb VPS</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>128mb RAM</li>
<li>256mb burstable RAM</li>
<li>10gb of disk space</li>
<li>500gb of network transfer</li>
<li>Buffalo, New York data center</li>
<li>$15 per year</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>BuyVM Hardware:</strong></p>
<pre>
# cat /proc/cpuinfo 
processor	: 0
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 45
model name	:       Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630L 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping	: 7
cpu MHz		: 2000.238
cache size	: 4096 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 8
core id		: 0
cpu cores	: 8
apicid		: 0
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 13
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm
bogomips	: 4000.47
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
</pre>
<p><strong>BuyVM Benchmarks:</strong></p>
<pre>
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: buf: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-pony6-3 -- #1 SMP Tue Mar 13 07:31:44 PDT 2012
   Machine: i686 (i386)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630L 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   20:57:51 up 14 days,  2:50,  1 user,  load average: 0.12, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Sep 27 2012 20:57:51 - 21:25:50
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables        9409043.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     1684.9 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2529.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        363239.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          102493.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        918987.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              651838.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 162921.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               7900.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2963.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    411.7 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         587959.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0    9409043.3    806.3
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       1684.9    306.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2529.9    588.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     363239.9    917.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     102493.8    619.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     918987.7   1584.5
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     651838.6    524.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     162921.3    407.3
Process Creation                                126.0       7900.2    627.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2963.0    698.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        411.7    686.2
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     587959.3    392.0
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         621.0
</pre>
<p><strong>ioping default I/O:</strong></p>
<pre>
dd if=/dev/zero of=testfilex bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.875 seconds, 277 MB/s

************************
starting ioping tests...
***************************************************
ioping disk I/O test (default 1MB working set)
***************************************************
disk I/O: /
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4010.1 ms, 4664 iops, 18.2 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/0.2/0.3/0.0 ms

**********************************************
seek rate test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
seek rate: /
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
1443 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 6125 iops, 23.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.2/0.7/0.0 ms

**********************************************
sequential test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
-----------------------
sequential: /
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
267 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 111 iops, 27.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 7.6/9.0/13.5/0.8 ms
-----------------------
sequential cached I/O: /
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
1495 requests completed in 3001.8 ms, 11344 iops, 2836.1 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.5/0.0 ms
</pre>
<p><strong>ioping custom I/O:</strong></p>
<pre>
################################
ioping disk I/O test
(custom 4 32 64 256 (KB) request size)
################################

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 4K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4009.2 ms, 5097 iops, 19.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/0.3/0.0 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 32K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4013.2 ms, 836 iops, 26.1 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 1.1/1.2/1.4/0.1 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 64K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4020.8 ms, 413 iops, 25.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 2.1/2.4/2.7/0.2 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 256K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4053.8 ms, 108 iops, 27.0 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 8.3/9.3/9.9/0.5 ms

################################
ioping seek rate test
(custom 4 32 64 256 (KB) request size)
################################

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 4K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
1495 requests completed in 3001.7 ms, 6704 iops, 26.2 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/1.4/0.0 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 32K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
996 requests completed in 3001.2 ms, 874 iops, 27.3 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.9/1.1/5.0/0.2 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 64K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
740 requests completed in 3004.1 ms, 425 iops, 26.5 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 1.9/2.4/6.4/0.4 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 256K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
222 requests completed in 3007.0 ms, 84 iops, 21.0 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 7.9/11.9/55.7/4.4 ms
</pre>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong><br />
BuyVM is a reliable, solid company but their previous business model of hoarding up stock for massive releases are no more anymore and I think the infamous &#8220;stock will be available soon&#8221; inside joke is now over. I don&#8217;t know how it&#8217;ll affect their business but looking at the BuyVM stock app from the Android market, I see there are more than enough stock in Buffalo, NY.</p>
<p>The disk performance is pretty awesome and for $15 per year is not bad at all for the performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/buyvm-benchmarks-buffalo-new-york/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BlueVM &#8211; 256mb Atlanta VPS Benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/bluevm-256mb-atlanta-vps-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/bluevm-256mb-atlanta-vps-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VPS Benchmarks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atlanta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bandwidth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gigabit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenVZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xeon 2 Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta VPS hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta VPS provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlueVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlueVM benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlueVM Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlueVM company information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlueVM information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlueVM review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ishaq Azmi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vpsbenchmarks.net/?p=516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction: BlueVM is well, I don&#8217;t know anything about them. They are a hosting provider who generally hangs around LowEndBox / LowEndTalk. They ran a new promotion today, with a 256mb VPS for $1.99 per month, and I decided to pick one up figuring that $1.99/mo could not be much to lose. Speaking about I ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Introduction:</strong><br />
<a title="BlueVM" href="http://bluevm.net" target="_blank">BlueVM</a> is well, I don&#8217;t know anything about them. They are a hosting provider who generally hangs around LowEndBox / LowEndTalk. They ran a new promotion today, with a 256mb VPS for $1.99 per month, and I decided to pick one up figuring that $1.99/mo could not be much to lose.</p>
<p>Speaking about I don&#8217;t know anything about them, there is nothing on their website or any registered business information on the site. The WHOIS information is even worse.</p>
<pre>Domain name: bluevm.com

Registrant Contact:
   BlueVM Communications
    ()

   Fax: 
   3403 Taylor St
   Honolulu, HI 96818
   US</pre>
<p>The phone number in the WHOIS is 850-313-4327, which is in the Milton, Florida area and the WHOIS information is Hawaii? I ran the address through Google and it points to a residence.</p>
<p>Plus no datacenter or network information and these guys are posted on LowEndBox&#8217;s front page with no issue? I&#8217;ve seen other providers put in the ringer for much less, such as misspellings, and these guys get a free pass?</p>
<p>The only information I have is their Level 3 technician is named Ishaq Azmi and a Google search of that name brings up Twitter accounts, the IRC server he runs and other social media stuff. Ishaq seems like a technical kinda guy too by the looks of it too..</p>
<p>Very unusual, but regardless I will let you make the assumption and if you should risk losing money or if you would go with a company that has public business information, about information on their website and other information.</p>
<p><strong>BlueVM 3</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>2 CPU cores</li>
<li>256mb RAM</li>
<li>512mb RAM</li>
<li>40gb disk space</li>
<li>1TB of network transfer</li>
<li>OpenVZ virtualization / <del>unsure about control panel. Looks like Kloxo</del>&#8230;(ended up being HyperVM)</li>
<li>Your choice of data center: Atlanta, Kansas, Illinois and California.</li>
<li>$3.50 per month</li>
</ul>
<p>I chose for Atlanta, Georgia location and servers are hosted with <a title="ColoAt" href="http://www.coloat.com" target="_blank">Colo at 55</a> in downtown Atlanta.</p>
<p><strong>BuyVM Benchmarks:</strong></p>
<pre>   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: bluevm: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-308.8.2.el5.028stab101.1 -- #1 SMP Sun Jun 24 20:25:35 MSD 2012
   Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   03:17:50 up 14 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.13, 0.31, 0.24; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Sep 27 2012 03:17:50 - 03:52:14
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       22708945.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2982.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2951.6 lps   (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        441949.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          127116.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        642908.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              910522.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 265894.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               9562.3 lps   (31.2 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   4243.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    666.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         801794.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   22708945.7   1945.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2982.2    542.2
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2951.6    686.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     441949.7   1116.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     127116.3    768.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     642908.8   1108.5
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     910522.8    731.9
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     265894.8    664.7
Process Creation                                126.0       9562.3    758.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       4243.0   1000.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        666.8   1111.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     801794.1    534.5
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         854.3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Sep 27 2012 03:52:14 - 04:23:56
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       39315484.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     5883.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4199.0 lps   (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        157967.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           49126.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        394414.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1649637.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 468139.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              13871.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   5417.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    681.2 lpm   (60.2 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1205504.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   39315484.7   3368.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       5883.5   1069.7
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4199.0    976.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     157967.4    398.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      49126.1    296.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     394414.3    680.0
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1649637.0   1326.1
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     468139.7   1170.3
Process Creation                                126.0      13871.1   1100.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       5417.6   1277.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        681.2   1135.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1205504.8    803.7
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         953.5</pre>
<p><strong>BlueVM Hardware:</strong></p>
<pre># cat /proc/cpuinfo 
processor	: 0
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 23
model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           L5420  @ 2.50GHz
stepping	: 10
cpu MHz		: 2248.534
cache size	: 6144 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 4
core id		: 0
cpu cores	: 4
apicid		: 0
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 13
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 lahf_lm
bogomips	: 4999.99
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 38 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor	: 1
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 23
model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           L5420  @ 2.50GHz
stepping	: 10
cpu MHz		: 2248.534
cache size	: 6144 KB
physical id	: 1
siblings	: 4
core id		: 0
cpu cores	: 4
apicid		: 4
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 13
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 lahf_lm
bogomips	: 5000.03
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 38 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:</pre>
<p><strong>ioping default I/O:</strong></p>
<pre>dd if=/dev/zero of=testfilex bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 11.0119 s, 97.5 MB/s

************************
starting ioping tests...
***************************************************
ioping disk I/O test (default 1MB working set)
***************************************************
disk I/O: /
--- / ( ) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4039.7 ms, 140 iops, 0.5 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/7.1/19.1/7.0 ms

**********************************************
seek rate test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
seek rate: /
--- / ( ) ioping statistics ---
478 requests completed in 3009.8 ms, 206 iops, 0.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/4.9/162.4/11.1 ms

**********************************************
sequential test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
-----------------------
sequential: /
--- / ( ) ioping statistics ---
322 requests completed in 3004.6 ms, 122 iops, 30.4 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 3.9/8.2/66.1/8.4 ms
-----------------------
sequential cached I/O: /
--- / ( ) ioping statistics ---
2892 requests completed in 3000.0 ms, 8503 iops, 2125.7 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.8/0.0 ms</pre>
<p><strong>ioping custom I/O:</strong></p>
<pre>################################
ioping disk I/O test
(custom 4 32 64 256 (KB) request size)
################################

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 4K test
***************************************
--- / ( ) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4059.5 ms, 89 iops, 0.3 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/11.2/21.0/7.7 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 32K test
***************************************
--- / ( ) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4114.8 ms, 45 iops, 1.4 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 6.1/22.3/41.7/15.9 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 64K test
***************************************
--- / ( ) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4090.4 ms, 58 iops, 3.6 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 2.5/17.3/39.2/13.4 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 256K test
***************************************
--- / ( ) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4163.3 ms, 32 iops, 7.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 10.2/31.6/62.5/17.6 ms

################################
ioping seek rate test
(custom 4 32 64 256 (KB) request size)
################################

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 4K test
***************************************
--- / ( ) ioping statistics ---
590 requests completed in 3001.0 ms, 242 iops, 0.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/4.1/30.2/6.0 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 32K test
***************************************
--- / ( ) ioping statistics ---
211 requests completed in 3017.6 ms, 76 iops, 2.4 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.7/13.1/184.4/18.1 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 64K test
***************************************
--- / ( ) ioping statistics ---
112 requests completed in 3018.1 ms, 39 iops, 2.4 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 2.1/25.9/375.6/53.9 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 256K test
***************************************
--- / ( ) ioping statistics ---
105 requests completed in 3042.3 ms, 36 iops, 9.0 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 7.3/27.9/122.9/25.5 ms</pre>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong><br />
<a title="BlueVM" href="http://bluevm.net">BlueVM</a> has a relatively good hardware performance and benchmarks but I just can&#8217;t get over the LowEndBox free pass from BlueVM over their lack of business information, lack of WHOIS information and even something as important as lack of network information on their website. No data center information in any of the 4 facilities you are in, no test IPs or test files?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep you updated on the progress and uptime on this VPS to give this company the benefit of the doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/bluevm-256mb-atlanta-vps-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cortex Networks &#8211; Dallas OpenVZ VPS Hosting</title>
		<link>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/cortex-networks-dallas-openvz-vps-hosting/</link>
		<comments>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/cortex-networks-dallas-openvz-vps-hosting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VPS Benchmarks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[100Mbps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bandwidth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenVZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cortex Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cortex Networks benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cortex Networks review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Countryman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vpsbenchmarks.net/?p=513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cortex Networks is a hosting company based in Florida, with a registered LLC, and has servers in Florida, Dallas and Chicago. The plan I have is: 4 CPUs 1024mb RAM 2048mb burstable RAM 100gb of disk space 800gb of network transfer 2 IPv4 addresses $19.95 per month More plans Cortex Networks Benchmarks: BYTE UNIX Benchmarks ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cortexnetworks.com/vps" target="_blank">Cortex Networks</a> is a hosting company based in Florida, with a registered LLC, and has servers in Florida, Dallas and Chicago.</p>
<p>The plan I have is:</p>
<ul>
<li>4 CPUs</li>
<li>1024mb RAM</li>
<li>2048mb burstable RAM</li>
<li>100gb of disk space</li>
<li>800gb of network transfer</li>
<li>2 IPv4 addresses</li>
<li>$19.95 per month</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.cortexnetworks.com/vps" target="_blank">More plans</a></p>
<p><strong>Cortex Networks Benchmarks:</strong></p>
<pre>   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: www-tx: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-274.3.1.el5.028stab094.3 -- #1 SMP Thu Sep 22 13:24:07 MSD 2011
   Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 275 (4410.1 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 1: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 275 (4409.4 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 2: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 275 (4409.4 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 3: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 275 (4409.4 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   23:58:22 up 170 days,  1:49,  1 user,  load average: 0.61, 0.36, 0.14; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 26 2012 23:58:22 - 00:26:21
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables        7770147.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     1796.4 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1777.6 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        215332.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           75774.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        476362.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              758922.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  96907.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               4009.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2721.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    828.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1883223.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0    7770147.4    665.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       1796.4    326.6
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1777.6    413.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     215332.6    543.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      75774.4    457.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     476362.7    821.3
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     758922.3    610.1
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      96907.6    242.3
Process Creation                                126.0       4009.1    318.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2721.5    641.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        828.4   1380.7
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1883223.1   1255.5
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         560.5

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Sep 27 2012 00:26:21 - 00:54:29
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       30846247.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     7578.7 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               5617.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        139797.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           39558.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        332519.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             2878403.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 674097.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              16336.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   6697.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1015.0 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        2085313.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   30846247.5   2643.2
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       7578.7   1377.9
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5617.3   1306.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     139797.2    353.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      39558.4    239.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     332519.5    573.3
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2878403.4   2313.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     674097.7   1685.2
Process Creation                                126.0      16336.2   1296.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       6697.3   1579.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1015.0   1691.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2085313.4   1390.2
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1129.7</pre>
<p>ChicagoVPS Hardware:</p>
<pre># cat /proc/cpuinfo 
processor	: 0
vendor_id	: AuthenticAMD
cpu family	: 15
model		: 33
model name	: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 275
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 2205.049
cache size	: 1024 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 2
core id		: 0
cpu cores	: 2
apicid		: 0
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 1
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow pni lahf_lm cmp_legacy
bogomips	: 4410.09
TLB size	: 1024 4K pages
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts fid vid ttp

processor	: 1
vendor_id	: AuthenticAMD
cpu family	: 15
model		: 33
model name	: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 275
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 2205.049
cache size	: 1024 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 2
core id		: 1
cpu cores	: 2
apicid		: 1
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 1
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow pni lahf_lm cmp_legacy
bogomips	: 4409.39
TLB size	: 1024 4K pages
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts fid vid ttp

processor	: 2
vendor_id	: AuthenticAMD
cpu family	: 15
model		: 33
model name	: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 275
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 2205.049
cache size	: 1024 KB
physical id	: 1
siblings	: 2
core id		: 0
cpu cores	: 2
apicid		: 2
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 1
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow pni lahf_lm cmp_legacy
bogomips	: 4409.39
TLB size	: 1024 4K pages
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts fid vid ttp

processor	: 3
vendor_id	: AuthenticAMD
cpu family	: 15
model		: 33
model name	: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 275
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 2205.049
cache size	: 1024 KB
physical id	: 1
siblings	: 2
core id		: 1
cpu cores	: 2
apicid		: 3
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 1
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow pni lahf_lm cmp_legacy
bogomips	: 4409.39
TLB size	: 1024 4K pages
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts fid vid ttp</pre>
<p><strong>ioping default I/O:</strong></p>
<pre>**********************************
dd (sequential disk speed test)...
**********************************
dd if=/dev/zero of=testfilex bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 17.4127 seconds, 61.7 MB/s

************************
starting ioping tests...
***************************************************
ioping disk I/O test (default 1MB working set)
***************************************************
disk I/O: /
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4011.1 ms, 734 iops, 2.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/1.4/5.9/2.3 ms

**********************************************
seek rate test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
seek rate: /
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
422 requests completed in 3000.6 ms, 165 iops, 0.6 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/6.1/383.6/18.8 ms

**********************************************
sequential test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
-----------------------
sequential: /
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
208 requests completed in 3005.2 ms, 75 iops, 18.7 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 9.1/13.4/464.8/31.7 ms
-----------------------
sequential cached I/O: /
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
2998 requests completed in 3000.9 ms, 4895 iops, 1223.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/0.2/0.3/0.0 ms</pre>
<p><strong>ioping custom I/O:</strong></p>
<pre>***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 4K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4015.7 ms, 478 iops, 1.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/2.1/9.5/3.7 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 32K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4015.3 ms, 421 iops, 13.2 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 1.2/2.4/6.9/2.3 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 64K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4045.1 ms, 122 iops, 7.6 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 2.5/8.2/28.8/10.3 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 256K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4131.8 ms, 39 iops, 9.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 8.5/25.5/57.9/18.3 ms

################################
ioping seek rate test
(custom 4 32 64 256 (KB) request size)
################################

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 4K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
406 requests completed in 3004.6 ms, 162 iops, 0.6 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/6.2/310.2/15.7 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 32K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
314 requests completed in 3001.5 ms, 116 iops, 3.6 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 1.1/8.7/344.8/19.7 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 64K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
222 requests completed in 3003.3 ms, 82 iops, 5.1 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 2.3/12.2/417.2/27.9 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 256K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
110 requests completed in 3031.4 ms, 38 iops, 9.4 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 9.8/26.6/401.1/37.0 ms</pre>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.cortexnetworks.com/vps" target="_blank">Cortex Networks</a> is very reliable and I have been pleased for a long time with their service. I think I will be a customer for a long time and I appreciate Jeremy&#8217;s help over the past 6+ months.</p>
<p>If you want a solid service which the price reflects quality and with a company that is a registered LLC, go with Cortex Networks. If you want the same service but $10 cheaper and questionable reliability, go right ahead and find a potential fly-by-night company who could take your money!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/cortex-networks-dallas-openvz-vps-hosting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ChicagoVPS &#8211; 128mb Yearly VPS Benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/chicagovps-128mb-yearly-vps-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/chicagovps-128mb-yearly-vps-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VPS Benchmarks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Central USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenVZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[$12 per year VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ChicagoVPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ChicagoVPS Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ChicagoVPS Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ChicagoVPS Yearly VPS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vpsbenchmarks.net/?p=511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ChicagoVPS has offered a 128mb yearly VPS on various forums, websites like LowEndBox, and on their Twitter feed. I grabbed one to install nginx and serve up some static files. 1 CPU core 128mb RAM (no burstable) 10gb of disk space 100gb of network transfer Choice of Chicago or Buffalo, NY data center (Chicago, Illinois ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ChicagoVPS has offered a 128mb yearly VPS on various forums, websites like LowEndBox, and on their Twitter feed. I grabbed one to install nginx and serve up some static files.</p>
<p>1 CPU core<br />
128mb RAM (no burstable)<br />
10gb of disk space<br />
100gb of network transfer<br />
Choice of Chicago or Buffalo, NY data center<br />
(Chicago, Illinois data center in this review)<br />
$12 per year</p>
<p>ChicagoVPS Benchmarks:</p>
<pre>
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: cdn: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-274.3.1.el5.028stab094.3 -- #1 SMP Thu Sep 22 13:24:07 MSD 2011
   Machine: i686 (unknown)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4800.3 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   14:36:28 up 4 days, 17:14,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 26 2012 14:36:28 - 15:04:33
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       11543089.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2386.7 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               3433.0 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        408655.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          113248.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        928242.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              693537.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 210667.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               9472.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3437.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    481.8 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         572096.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   11543089.9    989.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2386.7    434.0
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3433.0    798.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     408655.5   1032.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     113248.4    684.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     928242.7   1600.4
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     693537.8    557.5
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     210667.2    526.7
Process Creation                                126.0       9472.8    751.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3437.2    810.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        481.8    802.9
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     572096.2    381.4
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         725.4
</pre>
<p>ChicagoVPS Hardware:</p>
<pre>
# cat /proc/cpuinfo 
processor	: 0
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 44
model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           E5620  @ 2.40GHz
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 2400.142
cache size	: 12288 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 8
core id		: 0
cpu cores	: 4
apicid		: 0
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 11
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc ida nonstop_tsc arat pni monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm
bogomips	: 4800.28
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: [8]
</pre>
<p><strong>ioping default I/O:</strong></p>
<pre>
Virtuzzo or OpenVZ Virtualisation detected
**********************************
dd (sequential disk speed test)...
**********************************
dd if=/dev/zero of=testfilex bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 12.9644 s, 82.8 MB/s

************************
starting ioping tests...
***************************************************
ioping disk I/O test (default 1MB working set)
***************************************************
disk I/O: /
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4004.7 ms, 6112 iops, 23.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/0.2/0.0 ms

**********************************************
seek rate test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
seek rate: /
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
2246 requests completed in 3001.0 ms, 2380 iops, 9.3 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.4/569.5/12.1 ms

**********************************************
sequential test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
-----------------------
sequential: /
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
163 requests completed in 3008.0 ms, 58 iops, 14.5 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 3.0/17.2/1351.7/107.3 ms
-----------------------
sequential cached I/O: /
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
2096 requests completed in 3000.2 ms, 12229 iops, 3057.4 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.4/0.0 ms
</pre>
<p><strong>ioping custom I/O:</strong></p>
<pre>
################################
ioping disk I/O test
(custom 4 32 64 256 (KB) request size)
################################

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 4K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4004.8 ms, 6098 iops, 23.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/0.3/0.1 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 32K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4008.7 ms, 1330 iops, 41.6 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.5/0.8/1.0/0.2 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 64K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4032.2 ms, 181 iops, 11.3 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 1.0/5.5/12.5/5.4 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping disk I/O test: 256K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4266.5 ms, 19 iops, 4.7 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 3.6/52.7/188.7/71.7 ms

################################
ioping seek rate test
(custom 4 32 64 256 (KB) request size)
################################

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 4K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
1638 requests completed in 3000.2 ms, 1271 iops, 5.0 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.8/535.6/14.0 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 32K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
1383 requests completed in 3001.2 ms, 1401 iops, 43.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.7/78.6/2.2 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 64K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
685 requests completed in 3000.0 ms, 305 iops, 19.1 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.7/3.3/446.4/17.9 ms

***************************************
[/] ioping seek rate test: 256K test
***************************************
--- / (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
331 requests completed in 3033.4 ms, 124 iops, 31.0 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 3.1/8.1/75.0/10.1 ms
</pre>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong><br />
ChicagoVPS&#8217; $12 per year offer is pretty decent.</p>
<p>Granted, some folks will avoid it because of 128mb of RAM and no burstable memory but if you need something totally low resource intensive, like a OpenVPN server or a webserver like nginx serving up static content, but likely some folks motivated by budget are going to try to load up WordPress running Apache and PHP which will die each time there are updates running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/chicagovps-128mb-yearly-vps-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VPS6.NET &#8211; Miami, Florida Xen VPS Hosting</title>
		<link>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/vps6-net-miami-florida-xen-vps-hosting/</link>
		<comments>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/vps6-net-miami-florida-xen-vps-hosting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VPS Benchmarks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bandwidth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gigabit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Xen VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Xen VPS Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami VPS Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami Xen VPS Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSD VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telx Miami VPS Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telx VPS Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPS6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPS6 Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPS6 SSD VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPS6.NET Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vpsbenchmarks.net/?p=500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeremy from VPS6.NET has been pushing me hard for reviews of his Xen VPS services and this is his recent offering from Miami, Florida as one of their nodes has a new friend &#8211; an additional node in Miami for Xen / Windows VPS orders. This is a review of their Xen VPS Hosting in ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy from <a href="http://www.vps6.net" title="VPS6.NET" target="_blank">VPS6.NET</a> has been pushing me hard for reviews of his Xen VPS services and this is his recent offering from Miami, Florida as one of their nodes has a new friend &#8211; an additional node in Miami for Xen / Windows VPS orders.</p>
<p>This is a review of their <a href="https://vps6.net/vps-xen.php" target="_blank">Xen VPS Hosting</a> in Miami, Florida.</p>
<p><strong>XEN-768</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>2 vCPU Cores</li>
<li>768MB DEDICATED RAM</li>
<li>1536MB SWAP RAM</li>
<li>40gb Disk Space</li>
<li>2000GB BANDWIDTH /MO.</li>
<li>1Gbps Uplink</li>
<li>RAID60 10K SAS DISKS</li>
<li>1 IPv4 Address</li>
</ul>
<p><strong> <a href="https://vps6.net/vps-xen.php" target="_blank">$18.95 per month*</a></strong></p>
<p>*Current coupon codes</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>DOUBLEMYVPS6</strong> &#8211; doubles your RAM and bandwidth <strong>if you prepay 3, 6 or 12 months (not valid for &#8220;monthly&#8221; orders).</strong></li>
<li><strong>POWERUP</strong> &#8211; additional 2 CPU cores OR an additional 1 TB of bandwidth, 10% off recurring and <strong><em>this is for monthly orders only</em></strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Servers are hosted in Miami, Florida at Telx&#8217;s hosting facility in downtown Miami. With the recent storm a few weeks ago, Telx&#8217;s facility was not impacted one bit by the tropical storm that blew past Miami. There was no power or network outages reported, plus Jeremy told me that everything flowed normally to their Central and South American hosting clients who prefer the Miami location over Chicago or Los Angeles because of the less latency the submarine fiber loop cable that runs from Miami, to Central America, to the top of South America and back to Miami then up the Eastern US to eventually link to the UK.</p>
<p>Telx Miami is located at 36 North East 2nd Street in downtown Miami in a seven story, fifty thousand square feet hosting facility. VPS6.NET&#8217;s colocation at Telx Miami gives VPS6.NET a blend of nLayer, AT&amp;T, XO and AboveNet at their location. Below, you can find test IP and test files:</p>
<ul>
<li>Test IP: 64.250.122.1</li>
<li>100MB Test File: <a href="http://64.250.122.122/100mb.bin" target="_blank">http://64.250.122.122/100mb.bin</a></li>
<li>1GB Test File: <a href="http://64.250.122.122/1gb.bin" target="_blank">http://64.250.122.122/1gb.bin</a></li>
</ul>
<p>VPS6.NET only uses premium VPS nodes compared to other folks who shop the bargain bin at a data center or budget, low end server provider like DataShack. Budget, low end and bargain all get you budget and low end results. However, the Miami Xen VPS node for VPS6.NET is as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li>Dual Xeon L5645 CPUs (24 HT Cores)</li>
<li>72GB ECC-Certified DDR3 RAM</li>
<li>16x 10k SAS Drives w/ RAID60</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>VPS6.NET UnixBench Benchmarks:</strong></p>
<pre>
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: miami: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Fri Jun 22 12:19:21 UTC 2012
   Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5640 @ 2.27GHz (4532.0 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5640 @ 2.27GHz (4532.0 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   16:51:31 up 13 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.14, 0.04, 0.01; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Sep 15 2012 16:51:31 - 17:19:28
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       14770653.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2348.4 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                                751.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        122626.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           33711.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        397931.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              200951.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  34450.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               1573.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   1627.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    314.7 lpm   (60.2 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         211419.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   14770653.5   1265.7
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2348.4    427.0
Execl Throughput                                 43.0        751.3    174.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     122626.7    309.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      33711.5    203.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     397931.4    686.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     200951.0    161.5
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      34450.5     86.1
Process Creation                                126.0       1573.2    124.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       1627.7    383.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        314.7    524.5
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     211419.9    140.9
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         276.7

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Sep 15 2012 17:19:28 - 17:47:21
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       29259557.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     4753.7 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1531.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        201394.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           53599.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        668362.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              387107.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  67328.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               2938.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2386.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    319.5 lpm   (60.2 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         408492.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   29259557.9   2507.2
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4753.7    864.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1531.1    356.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     201394.9    508.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      53599.6    323.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     668362.1   1152.3
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     387107.6    311.2
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      67328.3    168.3
Process Creation                                126.0       2938.8    233.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2386.1    562.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        319.5    532.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     408492.1    272.3
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         479.0
</pre>
<p>Note: when I used the POWERUP coupon for 2 additional CPUs, the UnixBench score was <strong>758.8</strong> compared to 479.0</p>
<p><strong>VPS6.NET Disk Performance:</strong><br />
IOPS:</p>
<pre>
# ioping -c 10 .
4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=1 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=2 time=0.3 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=3 time=0.3 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=4 time=0.3 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=5 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=6 time=0.3 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=7 time=0.3 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=8 time=0.3 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=9 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=10 time=0.3 ms

--- . (ext3 /dev/xvda1) ioping statistics ---
10 requests completed in 9004.5 ms, 3864 iops, 15.1 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/0.3/0.3/0.0 ms
</pre>
<p>I/O Seek Test (No Cache):</p>
<pre>
# ioping -RD .

--- . (ext3 /dev/xvda1) ioping statistics ---
10188 requests completed in 3000.3 ms, 6416 iops, 25.1 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/12.8/0.2 ms
</pre>
<p>I/O Reads – Sequential:</p>
<pre>
# ioping -RL .

--- . (ext3 /dev/xvda1) ioping statistics ---
3783 requests completed in 3000.4 ms, 1657 iops, 414.2 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.4/0.6/8.8/0.2 ms
</pre>
<p>I/O Reads &#8211; Cached:</p>
<pre>
# ioping -RC .

--- . (ext3 /dev/xvda1) ioping statistics ---
20235 requests completed in 3000.0 ms, 103934 iops, 406.0 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.0/0.1/0.0 ms
</pre>
<p>DD Test Results:</p>
<pre>
[root@miami ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=1gb1mb bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.69304 s, 291 MB/s

[root@miami ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=1gb16k bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.69069 s, 291 MB/s

[root@miami ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=1gbdsync bs=1M count=1k oflag=dsync
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 6.45297 s, 166 MB/s
</pre>
<p>Note: The first is 1000, 1mb block files, the second is 16000 16k block files and the third is 1000, 1mb block files without caching. All these &#8220;dd tests&#8221; are very consistent, reliable and often times better than some budget &#8220;SSD VPS&#8221; benchmarks.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong><br />
Might as well get the POWERUP coupon for 2 additional CPUs! I don&#8217;t see why you would need another 1TB of bandwidth when the plans offered by VPS6.NET have more than enough bandwidth unless you&#8217;re running some torrent seeding VPS or file sharing host which sucks bandwidth from everyone else on a node.</p>
<p>A lot of people ask when VPS6.NET is going to launch a SSD VPS product line and I see with the high 200s, almost 300 MB/s, on the dd tests it&#8217;s comparable to &#8220;budget&#8221;, &#8220;low end&#8221; SSD VPS providers in the under $10 range but VPS6.NET offers may more disk space than a budget SSD VPS provider with their Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) disk drives in their VPS nodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/09/vps6-net-miami-florida-xen-vps-hosting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VPS Benchmarks Update</title>
		<link>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/07/vps-benchmarks-update/</link>
		<comments>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/07/vps-benchmarks-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 18:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VPS Benchmarks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VPS Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSD VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UnixBench]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vpsbenchmarks.net/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey folks, it&#8217;s been over 2 months since I last posted. It&#8217;s been a wild ride. I could not login to my WordPress admin screen for a while and got sidetracked with other projects. Well it turns out my admin screen was hung up because of wp-content/object-cache.php after an upgrade. Deleting wp-content/object-cache.php will free up ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey folks, it&#8217;s been over 2 months since I last posted. It&#8217;s been a wild ride.</p>
<p>I could not login to my WordPress admin screen for a while and got sidetracked with other projects. Well it turns out my admin screen was hung up because of wp-content/object-cache.php after an upgrade. Deleting wp-content/object-cache.php will free up the &#8220;No Upgrade Required. Your WordPress database is already up-to-date!&#8221; error!</p>
<p>With that being said, I&#8217;ve launched a few projects.</p>
<p>ssdvps.info will review and show offers from <a href="http://ssdvps.info" title="SSD VPS " target="_blank">SSD VPS</a> providers.</p>
<p>Other projects are still under development but I will update this site with some benchmarks I&#8217;ve had for awhile. </p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/07/vps-benchmarks-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TransIP BladeVPS (Netherlands / Cloud) May 2012</title>
		<link>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/05/transip-bladevps-netherlands-cloud-may-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/05/transip-bladevps-netherlands-cloud-may-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 04:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VPS Benchmarks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gigabit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xeon 1 Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amsterdam VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netherlands VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TransIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TransIP BladeVPS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vpsbenchmarks.net/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Background: TransIP was founded in 2003 and has it&#8217;s own product called BladeVPS. TransIP is one of the largest domain providers in Benelux (Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg) region. TransIP co-owns the DCG data center in Amsterdam, The Netherlands and has an awesome network setup with a route for US customers and one for everyone ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Background:</strong><br />
<a href="https://www.transip.eu/about/" target="_blank">TransIP</a> was founded in 2003 and has it&#8217;s own product called BladeVPS. TransIP is one of the largest domain providers in Benelux (Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg) region.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.transip.eu/vps/network/" target="_blank">TransIP co-owns the DCG data center</a> in Amsterdam, The Netherlands and has an awesome network setup with a route for US customers and one for everyone else on the other side of the Atlantic.</p>
<pre>
# uptime
 22:54:35 up 43 days, 12:41,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.33
</pre>
<p>I am on the <a href="https://www.transip.eu/vps/pricing-and-purchase/" target="_blank">TransIP BlazeVPS-M</a> plan which is:</p>
<ul>
<li>1 CPU core</li>
<li>Intel X5650 2.67Ghz CPU</li>
<li>512mb RAM</li>
<li>25gb hard disk space</li>
<li>250gb network transfer</li>
<li>7.50EUR/mo</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://www.transip.eu/vps/pricing-and-purchase/" target="_blank">Order here</a></p>
<p><strong>Hardware:</strong></p>
<pre>
# cat /proc/cpuinfo 
processor	: 0
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 2
model name	: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.15.0
stepping	: 3
cpu MHz		: 2659.998
cache size	: 4096 KB
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 4
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm up rep_good pni cx16 popcnt hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips	: 5319.99
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
</pre>
<p><span id="more-486"></span></p>
<p><strong>ioping default I/O:</strong></p>
<pre>**********************************
dd (sequential disk speed test)...
**********************************
dd if=/dev/zero of=testfilex bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 13.2667 s, 80.9 MB/s

************************
starting ioping tests...
***************************************************
ioping disk I/O test (default 1MB working set)
***************************************************
disk I/O: /dev/vda
--- /dev/vda (device 25.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4016.8 ms, 323 iops, 1.3 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.6/3.1/12.5/4.7 ms

**********************************************
seek rate test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
seek rate: /dev/vda
--- /dev/vda (device 25.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
1247 requests completed in 3000.3 ms, 475 iops, 1.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.4/2.1/142.4/6.6 ms

**********************************************
sequential test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
-----------------------
sequential: /dev/vda
--- /dev/vda (device 25.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
825 requests completed in 3002.4 ms, 300 iops, 74.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 2.7/3.3/277.1/9.6 ms
-----------------------
sequential cached I/O: /dev/vda
--- /dev/vda (device 25.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
1987 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 802 iops, 200.5 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/1.2/16.3/1.2 ms
</pre>
<p><strong>ioping custom I/O:</strong></p>
<pre>################################
ioping disk I/O test
(custom 4 32 64 256 (KB) request size)
################################

***************************************
[/dev/vda] ioping disk I/O test: 4K test
***************************************
--- /dev/vda (device 25.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4015.7 ms, 336 iops, 1.3 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.6/3.0/12.1/4.6 ms

***************************************
[/dev/vda] ioping disk I/O test: 32K test
***************************************
--- /dev/vda (device 25.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4074.0 ms, 68 iops, 2.1 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 1.1/14.6/68.6/27.0 ms

***************************************
[/dev/vda] ioping disk I/O test: 64K test
***************************************
--- /dev/vda (device 25.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4007.8 ms, 744 iops, 46.5 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 1.2/1.3/1.6/0.1 ms

***************************************
[/dev/vda] ioping disk I/O test: 256K test
***************************************
--- /dev/vda (device 25.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4070.5 ms, 72 iops, 18.0 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 3.3/13.9/41.4/14.8 ms

################################
ioping seek rate test
(custom 4 32 64 256 (KB) request size)
################################

***************************************
[/dev/vda] ioping seek rate test: 4K test
***************************************
--- /dev/vda (device 25.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
1327 requests completed in 3005.3 ms, 511 iops, 2.0 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.4/2.0/122.6/5.4 ms

***************************************
[/dev/vda] ioping seek rate test: 32K test
***************************************
--- /dev/vda (device 25.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
1352 requests completed in 3000.6 ms, 519 iops, 16.2 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.6/1.9/76.1/4.1 ms

***************************************
[/dev/vda] ioping seek rate test: 64K test
***************************************
--- /dev/vda (device 25.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
1032 requests completed in 3006.3 ms, 386 iops, 24.1 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 1.0/2.6/141.4/7.2 ms

***************************************
[/dev/vda] ioping seek rate test: 256K test
***************************************
--- /dev/vda (device 25.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
597 requests completed in 3005.9 ms, 212 iops, 53.1 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 2.8/4.7/98.0/6.8 ms
</pre>
<p><strong>Network Test Files:</strong></p>
<pre># wget cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
--2012-05-11 22:48:00--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “100mb.test”

100%[======================================================================>] 104,857,600 48.9M/s   in 2.0s    

2012-05-11 22:48:02 (48.9 MB/s) - “100mb.test” saved [104857600/104857600]



# wget -O /dev/null http://atlanta1.linode.com/100MB-atlanta.bin
--2012-05-11 22:49:42--  http://atlanta1.linode.com/100MB-atlanta.bin
Resolving atlanta1.linode.com... 63.247.71.196
Connecting to atlanta1.linode.com|63.247.71.196|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “/dev/null”

100%[======================================================================>] 104,857,600 3.04M/s   in 35s     

2012-05-11 22:50:17 (2.89 MB/s) - “/dev/null” saved [104857600/104857600]



# wget -O /dev/null http://newark1.linode.com/100MB-newark.bin
--2012-05-11 22:50:31--  http://newark1.linode.com/100MB-newark.bin
Resolving newark1.linode.com... 207.192.68.6
Connecting to newark1.linode.com|207.192.68.6|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “/dev/null”

100%[======================================================================>] 104,857,600 3.92M/s   in 27s     

2012-05-11 22:50:58 (3.66 MB/s) - “/dev/null” saved [104857600/104857600]




# wget -O /dev/null http://dallas1.linode.com/100MB-dallas.bin
--2012-05-11 22:51:09--  http://dallas1.linode.com/100MB-dallas.bin
Resolving dallas1.linode.com... 69.164.200.100
Connecting to dallas1.linode.com|69.164.200.100|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “/dev/null”

100%[======================================================================>] 104,857,600 4.84M/s   in 26s     

2012-05-11 22:51:35 (3.83 MB/s) - “/dev/null” saved [104857600/104857600]</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vpsbenchmarks.net/benchmarks/2012/05/transip-bladevps-netherlands-cloud-may-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
