Jeremy from VPS6.NET has been pushing me hard for reviews of his Xen VPS services and this is his recent offering from Miami, Florida as one of their nodes has a new friend – an additional node in Miami for Xen / Windows VPS orders.
This is a review of their Xen VPS Hosting in Miami, Florida.
XEN-768
- 2 vCPU Cores
- 768MB DEDICATED RAM
- 1536MB SWAP RAM
- 40gb Disk Space
- 2000GB BANDWIDTH /MO.
- 1Gbps Uplink
- RAID60 10K SAS DISKS
- 1 IPv4 Address
*Current coupon codes
- DOUBLEMYVPS6 – doubles your RAM and bandwidth if you prepay 3, 6 or 12 months (not valid for “monthly” orders).
- POWERUP – additional 2 CPU cores OR an additional 1 TB of bandwidth, 10% off recurring and this is for monthly orders only.
Servers are hosted in Miami, Florida at Telx’s hosting facility in downtown Miami. With the recent storm a few weeks ago, Telx’s facility was not impacted one bit by the tropical storm that blew past Miami. There was no power or network outages reported, plus Jeremy told me that everything flowed normally to their Central and South American hosting clients who prefer the Miami location over Chicago or Los Angeles because of the less latency the submarine fiber loop cable that runs from Miami, to Central America, to the top of South America and back to Miami then up the Eastern US to eventually link to the UK.
Telx Miami is located at 36 North East 2nd Street in downtown Miami in a seven story, fifty thousand square feet hosting facility. VPS6.NET’s colocation at Telx Miami gives VPS6.NET a blend of nLayer, AT&T, XO and AboveNet at their location. Below, you can find test IP and test files:
- Test IP: 64.250.122.1
- 100MB Test File: http://64.250.122.122/100mb.bin
- 1GB Test File: http://64.250.122.122/1gb.bin
VPS6.NET only uses premium VPS nodes compared to other folks who shop the bargain bin at a data center or budget, low end server provider like DataShack. Budget, low end and bargain all get you budget and low end results. However, the Miami Xen VPS node for VPS6.NET is as follows:
- Dual Xeon L5645 CPUs (24 HT Cores)
- 72GB ECC-Certified DDR3 RAM
- 16x 10k SAS Drives w/ RAID60
VPS6.NET UnixBench Benchmarks:
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: miami: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Fri Jun 22 12:19:21 UTC 2012
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5640 @ 2.27GHz (4532.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5640 @ 2.27GHz (4532.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
16:51:31 up 13 min, 1 user, load average: 0.14, 0.04, 0.01; runlevel 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Sep 15 2012 16:51:31 - 17:19:28
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 14770653.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2348.4 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 751.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 122626.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 33711.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 397931.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 200951.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 34450.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 1573.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1627.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 314.7 lpm (60.2 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 211419.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 14770653.5 1265.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2348.4 427.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 751.3 174.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 122626.7 309.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 33711.5 203.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 397931.4 686.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 200951.0 161.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 34450.5 86.1
Process Creation 126.0 1573.2 124.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1627.7 383.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 314.7 524.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 211419.9 140.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 276.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Sep 15 2012 17:19:28 - 17:47:21
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 29259557.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4753.7 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1531.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 201394.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 53599.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 668362.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 387107.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 67328.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2938.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2386.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 319.5 lpm (60.2 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 408492.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 29259557.9 2507.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4753.7 864.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 1531.1 356.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 201394.9 508.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 53599.6 323.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 668362.1 1152.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 387107.6 311.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 67328.3 168.3
Process Creation 126.0 2938.8 233.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2386.1 562.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 319.5 532.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 408492.1 272.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 479.0
Note: when I used the POWERUP coupon for 2 additional CPUs, the UnixBench score was 758.8 compared to 479.0
VPS6.NET Disk Performance:
IOPS:
# ioping -c 10 . 4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=1 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=2 time=0.3 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=3 time=0.3 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=4 time=0.3 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=5 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=6 time=0.3 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=7 time=0.3 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=8 time=0.3 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=9 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=10 time=0.3 ms --- . (ext3 /dev/xvda1) ioping statistics --- 10 requests completed in 9004.5 ms, 3864 iops, 15.1 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/0.3/0.3/0.0 ms
I/O Seek Test (No Cache):
# ioping -RD . --- . (ext3 /dev/xvda1) ioping statistics --- 10188 requests completed in 3000.3 ms, 6416 iops, 25.1 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/12.8/0.2 ms
I/O Reads – Sequential:
# ioping -RL . --- . (ext3 /dev/xvda1) ioping statistics --- 3783 requests completed in 3000.4 ms, 1657 iops, 414.2 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.4/0.6/8.8/0.2 ms
I/O Reads – Cached:
# ioping -RC . --- . (ext3 /dev/xvda1) ioping statistics --- 20235 requests completed in 3000.0 ms, 103934 iops, 406.0 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.0/0.1/0.0 ms
DD Test Results:
[root@miami ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=1gb1mb bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.69304 s, 291 MB/s [root@miami ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=1gb16k bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.69069 s, 291 MB/s [root@miami ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=1gbdsync bs=1M count=1k oflag=dsync 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 6.45297 s, 166 MB/s
Note: The first is 1000, 1mb block files, the second is 16000 16k block files and the third is 1000, 1mb block files without caching. All these “dd tests” are very consistent, reliable and often times better than some budget “SSD VPS” benchmarks.
Conclusion:
Might as well get the POWERUP coupon for 2 additional CPUs! I don’t see why you would need another 1TB of bandwidth when the plans offered by VPS6.NET have more than enough bandwidth unless you’re running some torrent seeding VPS or file sharing host which sucks bandwidth from everyone else on a node.
A lot of people ask when VPS6.NET is going to launch a SSD VPS product line and I see with the high 200s, almost 300 MB/s, on the dd tests it’s comparable to “budget”, “low end” SSD VPS providers in the under $10 range but VPS6.NET offers may more disk space than a budget SSD VPS provider with their Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) disk drives in their VPS nodes.
VPS6.NET










Recent Comments